While a number of states are restricting access to abortion, Illinois and Nevada are reinforcing a woman’s right to choose.

By |2019-06-02T11:05:24-08:00June 3rd, 2019|Categories: News|Tags: , , , , , |3 Comments

Just when you thought the whole country was going crazy.

Courtesy of CNN:

While a wave of Republican-led states have recently pushed laws restricting abortion, Illinois and Nevada moved legislation forward Friday aimed at protecting access to the procedure.

The Illinois Legislature has sent Senate Bill 25, also called the Reproductive Health Act, to the governor’s desk that would protect the “fundamental rights of individuals to make autonomous decisions about one’s own reproductive health.” The measure passed the Illinois Democratic-led Senate late Friday with a 34-20 vote. Only one Democrat voted against the bill, and Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker has said he will sign the legislation.

Under the bill, pregnant women have the “fundamental right” to have an abortion and a “fertilized egg, embryo, or fetus does not have independent rights.”

It repeals the Illinois Abortion Law of 1975, which penalized doctors for performing the procedure, and the state’s ban on partial-birth abortions. The bill also provides insurance requirements to cover abortion procedures.

Well, look at that!

However, Nevada has a message for Illinois.

“Hold my beer.”

In Nevada on Friday, Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak signed the “Trust Nevada Women Act,” Senate Bill 179, which removes long-standing criminal penalties for abortion and requirements for medical providers.

“Nevada has a long history of trusting the women of our state to make their own reproductive health care decisions and protecting the right to reproductive freedom,” Sisolak said at the bill signing ceremony.

The new law decriminalizes certain actions related to performing abortions, abortion drugs and abortion prosecution. It rewrites existing state abortion laws that require physicians to notify a pregnant woman about the “emotional implications” of an abortion, instead requiring doctors “describe the nature and consequences of the procedure.”

Physicians in the state would also no longer have to certify in writing a pregnant woman’s marital status and age before performing an abortion as previous laws required.

“In light of increasing attacks at the federal level and in other states such as Georgia, Alabama, Missouri, and Louisiana, SB179 reaffirms Nevada’s commitment to protecting reproductive freedom and access to reproductive health care,” Sisolak said Friday.

If you are a woman currently living in Georgia or Kentucky right now looking for a state to live in that actually respects your right to control your own body, it appears that Illinois and Nevada might have just put themselves in play. 

I swear if women simply started a mass exodus from states that were restricting their access to abortions, they could change those laws overnight. 

About the Author:

This blog is dedicated to finding the truth, exposing the lies, and holding our politicians and leaders accountable when they fall far short of the promises that they have made to both my fellow Alaskans and the American people.

3 Comments

  1. OK June 4, 2019 at 8:08 am

    Not only women have abortions. “Trans, non-binary, and gender non-conforming people have faced brutal and dehumanizing attacks from the Trump administration: the banning of transgender Americans from the military; rolling back civil rights protections put in place under former president Barack Obama that banned discrimination against transgender patients by no longer recognizing gender identity as a basis for sex discrimination; considering defining gender as “a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth,” which would essentially legislate trans people out of existence.”

    https://thinkprogress.org/not-only-women-have-abortions-is-pro-choice-rhetoric-catching-up-with-that-reality-b2a2c70efd05/

    +

    https://thinkprogress.org/un-commissioner-says-us-abortion-bans-are-torture-and-deprivation-of-a-right-to-health-5e6e711bd8e0/

    “We have not called it out in the same way we have other forms of extremist hate, but this is gender-based violence against women, no question,”

Comments are closed.