House Judiciary Committee and DOJ strike deal for release of Mueller report documents.

By |2019-06-10T12:28:49-08:00June 10th, 2019|Categories: News|Tags: , , , , , |6 Comments

It looks like Bill Barr blinked first this time.

Courtesy of CNN:

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler on Monday said he has struck a deal with the Justice Department to begin providing Congress with some documents from the Mueller Report related to obstruction of justice.

Nadler announced the agreement ahead of a vote scheduled for Tuesday, when the House is expected to approve a resolution to go to court to enforce its subpoenas of Attorney General William Barr and former White House counsel Don McGahn.

But a court fight appears to be no longer necessary for the Barr subpoena — at least for the time being — as a result of the agreement the committee struck with the Justice Department. The details of which documents would be provided to the committee were not disclosed, but Nadler said the agreement would allow all Judiciary Committee members to see “Robert Mueller’s most important files … providing us with key evidence that the Special Counsel used to assess whether the President and others obstructed justice or were engaged in other misconduct.”

“These documents will allow us to perform our constitutional duties and decide how to respond to the allegations laid out against the President by the Special Counsel,” Nadler said.

The agreement is the first sign of a thaw between the House Judiciary Committee and the Justice Department, which have been battling over the special counsel’s report since Robert Mueller ended his investigation in March.

The White House and Bill Barr were really stressed out about the possibility that Congress would hold the Attorney General in contempt for not cooperating. 

However, Nadler does not seem ready to take that card completely off of the table:

Nadler said in the statement that he would “hold the criminal contempt process in abeyance for now” as a result of the agreement. But House Democrats were not voting on Tuesday on a criminal contempt citation against Barr — they have drafted a resolution to go to court under the so-called civil contempt process to enforce their subpoenas of Barr and McGahn.

Nadler said that vote would still happen on Tuesday, pointing to the fact that the resolution also included language authorizing court action against McGahn.

He said as long as the Justice Department “proceeds in good faith” there would be no further steps taken against Barr, but added: “If important information is held back, then we will have no choice but to enforce our subpoena in court and consider other remedies.”

Good for Nadler. 

I don’t trust this administration as far as I could throw Donald Trump against a strong headwind. 

It would not be at all surprising if they suddenly reneged on this agreement, or only cooperated minimally until they had their arm twisted yet again. 

About the Author:

This blog is dedicated to finding the truth, exposing the lies, and holding our politicians and leaders accountable when they fall far short of the promises that they have made to both my fellow Alaskans and the American people.


  1. AK Lynne June 10, 2019 at 5:24 pm

    Good news, but definitely continue to hold his feet to the fire.

  2. puck June 10, 2019 at 6:30 pm

    is this the real deal? are we seeing it all? can Barr be removed? there is so much going on i have a hard time following all of this.

  3. Anonymous June 10, 2019 at 9:41 pm

    Does Melania read this blog?

    Hey Melania, show us your tits.

  4. anonymous June 11, 2019 at 8:16 am

    “with their childish conduct, the Republicans admitted they don’t have a solid adult criticism of the Mueller report. Who knows, maybe if they had bothered to read it, they may have had something useful to contribute.”

    “The thing they did yesterday with this dog and pony show trotting out Dean was frankly just a colossal embarrassment.”
    Since the cable news networks chose to cover a helicopter crash instead of the hearing, you can watch Dean’s full testimony…
    Dean’s testimony was a rousing success, and if they couldn’t handle what Dean had to say, they are going to fall apart when the direct witnesses to obstruction of justice testify.”


  5. anonymous June 11, 2019 at 8:26 am

    Amash, one of the Freedom Caucus’ founding members, told CNN that he’d announced his resignation at the group’s weekly board meeting on Monday. “I didn’t want to be a further distraction for the group.”

Comments are closed.